Skip to content

Matters / Construction disputes

Establish responsibility and the route to resolution.

Construction Disputes

Corvinus reconstructs the project, tests the competing accounts and determines what the agreement, technical evidence and documentary record support before a legal route is chosen.

All matters

What Corvinus does

What Corvinus does on this matter.

The work within Corvinus's control, subject to the agreed scope.

  1. 01Reconstructs the project from the contract, drawings, instructions and correspondence.
  2. 02Tests each competing account against the contemporaneous record.
  3. 03Separates supported allegations from inference and contradiction.
  4. 04Defines the resolution route, or prepares the matter for specialist legal escalation.
Typical situations
  • The scope of work is disputed
  • Work is incomplete or has stopped
  • Several parties blame each other
  • Instructions and variations were not recorded
  • Correspondence has escalated without resolution

How it is examined

How the matter is examined.

  1. 01

    Reconstruct the project

    Assemble the contract, drawings, instructions, valuations and correspondence into one record.

  2. 02

    Test the accounts

    Compare what each party says against what the contemporaneous record shows.

  3. 03

    Establish responsibility

    Map each issue to the obligation, the party and the supporting evidence.

  4. 04

    Define the route

    Set out the resolution options and what escalation would require.

The difficulty

Why the matter becomes difficult.

Construction disputes rarely turn on a single question. Scope, instruction, design, workmanship, coordination, valuation and payment interact, and the accounts of the parties often diverge long before any legal issue is identified.

What Corvinus establishes

What is established before any position is advanced.

  • 01

    Scope and contract

    The agreed scope and the contractual framework.

  • 02

    Responsibility

    Who carried design, instruction, workmanship, coordination and payment responsibilities.

  • 03

    What was delivered

    What was built, omitted, changed or left incomplete.

  • 04

    Allegation status

    Which allegations are supported, inferred or contradicted.

  • 05

    Causation issues

    Causation and responsibility issues requiring specialist technical input.

  • 06

    Available routes

    The available remedial, valuation, negotiation or escalation routes.

  • 07

    Evidence gaps

    What evidence is missing.

Legal and technical framework

What may govern this matter.

Jurisdiction: England and Wales. Applicability depends on the contract, lease, works, parties and facts. This page provides general information and does not determine the position on a particular matter.

View the legal and technical framework
The agreement governs
The actual contract, quotation, specification, drawings, instructions and professional appointments govern the analysis.
Consumer Rights Act 2015
Duties under the Act may apply to qualifying consumer contracts, including the duty to perform a service with reasonable care and skill. Applicability depends on the parties and the contract.
Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996
The Act and the Scheme for Construction Contracts may apply to qualifying construction contracts, subject to the statutory exclusions and the actual contractual arrangement.
Technical standards as evidence
Building Regulations, Approved Documents, technical standards and manufacturer requirements may be relevant evidence, but must be applied according to their legal and contractual status.
Non-compliance is not liability
Technical non-compliance does not automatically establish a particular party's legal liability. Causation, responsibility and loss are separate questions.

Resolution

What resolution may look like.

These are the routes the work is intended to make available. Whether any is realistic depends on the lease, contract, works and facts.

  • Agreement on remedial work
  • Agreement on completion or scope
  • Account reconciliation
  • Narrowing disputed issues
  • Supported pre-action correspondence
  • Negotiation or mediation preparation
  • Escalation with a prepared matter

What you receive

The output is the product.

The deliverables within Corvinus's control on this matter, subject to the agreed scope.

  • 01Matter Reconstruction
  • 02Contract and Scope Analysis
  • 03Chronology
  • 04Technical Issue Schedule
  • 05Evidence Matrix
  • 06Responsibility Matrix
  • 07Resolution Strategy
  • 08Draft Pre-Litigation Correspondence
  • 09Escalation Pack

If the matter does not resolve

Prepared for specialist legal escalation.

Corvinus prepares the contract analysis, chronology, technical issues, evidence matrix and unresolved legal questions for a specialist construction solicitor or counsel.

  • Matter summary and chronology
  • Contract and scope analysis
  • Technical issue schedule
  • Evidence and responsibility matrices
  • Strengths, weaknesses and unresolved issues
  • Briefing for a specialist construction solicitor or counsel

Common failure points

What goes wrong, and the better route.

Escalating before the record is assembled

Positions are taken that the documents may not support.

Better route
Reconstruct the project record before correspondence hardens.

Treating a technical view as a legal conclusion

Responsibility is assumed where the contract may allocate it differently.

Better route
Map technical findings onto the contractual obligations.

Leaving instructions unrecorded

Variations and scope changes become contested from memory.

Better route
Reconstruct and evidence the instruction history.

Common questions

Questions about construction disputes.

Present a matter

Establish responsibility and the route to resolution.

Present the issue first. Corvinus will determine whether the matter is suitable, what information is required and what the proposed scope should address.

Initial enquiry · No obligation to proceed